🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.