🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.