🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add several five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action comes amid a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party officials decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading Democratic figure argued the court had another time shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.